KGB & Other Buddies in Putin Apparat
By RICHARD F. STAAR(1)
Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace
Stanford University
With the election on 26 March of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin as president
of Russia, it was natural to speculate about whom he would bring into his
administration and what policies he may pursue. Fortunately, two recently
published articles identify 26 individuals, already in government or soon
to be occupying responsible positions, as Putin appointees (see table below).
Almost half of them have been identified as former or current KGB/FSB intelligence
officers. The percentage may be even higher, because only sparse data are
available on the backgrounds of other recent appointees.
This situation seems natural enough, if one expects Putin to bring into
his own presidential administration "the best and the brightest"
(as he calls his former KGB/FSB colleagues), who will implement his policies.
Since organized crime controls some 40 percent of GDP, according to the
new president,(2) one would look for him to curtail such activities on a
priority basis.
Assignment of current and/or former intelligence officers to key governmental
positions suggests that Russia is on its way to becoming an authoritarian
state, as it had been from Lenin through Khrushchev. Already, the FSB (domestic
intelligence agency) has been ordered to monitor the allegiance of military
personnel, i.e., becoming a police force in the armed services. At
the same time, military training of schoolboys from age 15 was instituted
on 31 December 1999, the day that Putin became acting president.(3)
Early in the subsequent month, Putin approved a law providing security agencies
with access to all e-mail in Russia as well as other electronic traffic
carried on the Internet. "This means Russia has become a police state,"
said Yelena Bonner, widow of the late nuclear physicist and Soviet-era dissident
Andrei Sakharov.(4) Moreover, Putin himself has never condemned either the
role played by the secret police or the mass deportations of the Chechen
people by Stalin. On the contrary, as acting president, he explained his
actions as follows:
"The people want order to be introduced in Russia. And we are acting
in the North Caucasus. I can firmly say we are doing this on the instruction
of the Russian people."(5)
According to an eyewitness report from Moscow, soon after assuming the premiership,
Putin invited his four immediate predecessors (Yevgeny Primakov, Viktor
Chernomyrdin, Sergei Kirienko, and Sergei Stepashin) to provide him with
advice regarding Chechnya. They all counseled caution in early September
1999, suggesting occupation only of the flat northern one-third of the territory.
From such a vantage point, commando raids could be launched against rebel
leaders. This advice was not heeded. Russia attempted to take control of
mountainous areas, which Stepashin doubts Russia will be able to secure.(6)
In the meanwhile, the capital city of Grozny has been leveled and its 400,000
inhabitants dispersed. Some 300,000 refugees have fled abroad, at least
10,000 Chechens have been killed, and yet the fighting continues. Some of
the atrocities have been filmed and even aired on television in Moscow.
Is this what the Russian people really want?
The pro-government Russian Public Television (ORT) recently showed the bombing
of a large Chechen village by TOS-1 rockets, filled with flammable liquid,
and Tochka-U missiles that cover up to seven hectares of land with cluster
shrapnel actions in clear violation of the 1980 Geneva Convention.(7) Since
the order to do so has been approved by Putin, he should be tried as a war
criminal.
The Russian "people," we are told, want law and order. There has
been little discussion as to how this will be effected under the Putin presidency.
He also vows to eliminate corruption. However, allegations and rumors hinting
at Putin's involvement in questionable business and governmental activities
during the past decade have surfaced time and again. Should these allegations
prove to be true, they cast a different light on the man who has attempted
to project himself as a crime fighter who will eliminate corruption in high
places. Crime and corruption among government officials increased by 35.6
percent during 1999, according to First Deputy Interior Minister Vladimir
Kozlov. The total number of cases reached 53,700, although only 21,000 officials
were charged.(8)
On the other hand, the new national security concept, signed by acting President
Putin on 6 January 2000, holds greater significance for the United States
and the international community as a whole. It should be noted that he had
been responsible for producing this document as Yel'tsin's national security
advisor.
Most significant in this concept is the reversal from an earlier "no
first-use" pledge regarding nuclear weapons. Basic external threats
to Russia, according to the document, include:
attempts to weaken the political, economic, and military influence of
Russia in the world;
the strengthening of politico-military blocs, especially through NATO
expansion eastward;
the possibility that foreign military blocs will appear within the immediate
proximity of Russian borders;
proliferation of mass-destruction weapons and delivery systems;
intensification of centrifugal processes within the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS);
penetration and escalation of conflicts near Russian and CIS borders;
territorial demands against Russia.(9)
The same section states that the foregoing may also affect Russia's national
interests in Europe, the Middle East, Transcaucasus, Central Asia, and the
Asian-Pacific region, i.e., most of the world outside of Africa and
the Western Hemisphere.
It should be noted that the new national security concept supersedes the
one issued as a decree by then President Boris N. Yel'tsin on 17 December
1997. No public discussion ever took place on the draft versions of either
document. Parliament also had been ignored both times. The current concept
is described as being a political document based upon government policy
regarding "defense of the country from external and internal threats."
These threats include foreign intelligence organizations which allegedly
have activated their clandestine special services on Russian territory.
Attempts at interference also emanate from other government levels. Direct
threats include separatism and local armed conflict. Information warfare
is supposedly being intensified by unfriendly regimes through attempts to
remove Russia from both external and internal information marketplaces.
Guaranteeing Russia's national security involves the following tasks:
maintenance of territorial integrity and security of borders;
support at adequate levels of military potential;
tightening non-proliferation of mass destruction weapons;
introduction of effective measures to frustrate subversive activities
by foreign intelligence agencies.
Such an atmosphere suggests an attempt to create a "Fortress Russia"
mentality, so that the population will support all measures by the new government
in Moscow, regardless of their impact on the average citizen.
In its conclusion, the new national security concept envisages the stationing
of Russian troops in "certain strategically important regions of the
world." Such "limited military contingents" (the 100,000
Soviet troops in Afghanistan during 197989 as well as the combat brigade
with nuclear weapons in Cuba during 26 October25 December 1962 both shared
that designation) would be located at overseas military bases, which could
guarantee reaction to crisis situations in their initial stages.
By replacing the former designation "partnership" with the word
"cooperation" with the West, the tone of this new and more neutral
term suggests a revised official attitude in Moscow. The latest security
concept, thus, emphasizes Russia's nuclear power. This makes it imperative
for the United States to consider the real danger of tactical nuclear weapons
being used by Moscow. The possibility of their application during a future
local war, or even the one in Chechnya today, becomes greater as Russia's
conventional armed forces deteriorate.
Addressing a session of the Security Council in Moscow on 23 November 1999,
then Prime Minister Putin stated that additional funds would be provided
for deployment in the Mediterranean of Russia's sole aircraft carrier, the
AdmiralKuznetsov, one destroyer, a frigate, one tanker, and
nuclear-powered submarines carrying SLBMs by November 2000. The Tartus base
in Syria, first used for Russia's Mediterranean squadron in 1983, will be
reactivated. Improvements at the Cam Ranh Bay naval installation for Russia's
15th Operational Squadron are also planned, based on the 1979 agreement
with Vietnam which expires in 2004.(10)
Two months later, then acting President Putin announced at a meeting of
his cabinet that funds for the government's acquisition of new weapons systems
(goszakaz) would be increased by 150 percent compared with calendar
year 1999. He also stated that the military-industrial complex had produced
30 percent more high-technology arms during that timeframe than in 1998,
all of world-class quality.(11)
At the same meeting of his cabinet ministers on 27 January 2000, Putin announced
that defense spending would be 50 percent higher than during 1999. There
also will be a change in priorities from the policy in recent years of allocating
80 percent of all funds to strategic missile forces. This will drop to 30
percent, with the rest to be spent for conventional weapons systems.(12)
The foregoing are obviously future intentions and should not be confused
with capabilities. However, the West in general and the United States in
particular have been placed on notice that Russia under its new president
intends to become a rival in due course and not a partner.
Putin's Cadres in St. Petersburg
and Moscow
Name
Position
Connection
Abramov, Aleksandr
Deputy Director, Presidential Administration
(relations with regions)
ex-VP, Al'fa Bank
Alekseev, Sergei
Director, largest exhibit hall (LenExpo) in
St. Petersburg
acquaintance from
St. Petersburg
Bobrovsky, Nikolai
Deputy Director, Prime Minister's secretariat
co-student at KGB Institute
Bolloev, Taimuraz
Director General, Baltika Beer Co.
sports connection
Chemezov, Sergei
Head, PromEksport
ex-KGB officer
Cherkesov, Viktor
First Deputy Director, FSB
co-student at law school
Golov, Sergei
Deputy Director, Presidential Administration
ex-KGB officer
Golubev, Valeri
Head, Tourism Commission, St. Petersburg
ex-KGB officer
Gref, German
First Deputy Minister, Government Property Office
head, Center for Strategic Studies
Ivanov, Sergei
Secretary, Security Council
ex-KGB officer and close friend
Ivanov, Viktor
Deputy Director, Presidential Administration
ex-KGB/FSB
Khrameshkin, Nikolai
Director, "Leningrad" Import-Export
--Industry Association
acquaintance from St. Petersburg
Kozak, Dmitri
Putin's Deputy Chief of Staff
worked with VVP in St. Peterburg
Kozhin, Vladimir
Head, Foreign Exchange Export Control (FSB)
ex-KGB officer
Kudrin, Aleksei
First Deputy Finance Minister
knew VVP in St. Petersburg
Medvedev, Dmitri
Deputy Director, Presidential Administration
law degree, St. Petersburg
Miller, Aleksei
Director, Baltic Pipeline Co.
former VVP deputy, St. Petersburg
Patrushev, Nikolai
Director, FSB
(succeeded VVP) in
Leningrad KGB
Reiman, Leonid
Communications Minister
friend and traveling companion
Sechin, Igor'
Deputy Director, Presidential Administration
headed VVP Secretariat, when PM
Shamakhov, Vladimir
Director,
NW Administration,
State Customs (FSB)
friend and ex-KGB officer
Shevchenko, Yuri
Health Minister and M.D
old acquaintance
Spassky, Boris
Academician; Director, Defense Research Institute
acquaintance from St. Petersburg
Stepanov, Andrei
Director, Oil Co., St. Petersburg
worked with VVP in St. Petersburg
Yakovlev, Vladimir
Chairman, Culture Commission, St. Petersburg
close friend
Zaostrovsky, Yuri
Deputy Director, FSB
ex-KGB officer
Sources:
Dmitri Ezhov, "Dos'e: Blizhnii krug," Sobesednik, no. 1
(806), 1319 January 2000, p. 3; Igor' Cherniak, "Liudi Putina: kto
est' kto," Komosomsol'skaya pravda, no. 14 (23238),
26 January 2000, p. 6.
Note:
The author expresses his gratitude to Ms. Molly Molloy, Slavic research
librarian at the Hoover Institution, for her kind assistance in compiling
this table as well as for other invaluable help.
Notes:
1. A senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Dr. Staar is also a visiting
Professor of Political Science at Duquesne University and author of The
New Military in Russia (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1996).
2. V.V. Putin, "Rossiya na rubezhe tysiacheletiya," http://government.gov.ru
(posted 1 January 2000), p. 16.
3Moscow Times, 11 February 2000; cited by RFE/RL Newsline,11
February 2000.
4. Quotation cited by Jannie Detmer, "Putin Remolds Russia of Old,"
Washington Times, 17 February 2000, p. 1.
5. Quoted by Fred Weir, "Putin Dodges Foreign Critics of Chechnya War,"
Christian Science Monitor, 31 January 2000, p. 7.
6. Stepashin interview in Moscow with Michael R. Gordon, "A Look at
How the Kremlin Slid into the Chechnya War," TheNew York
Times, 1 February 2000, p. A-6.
7. Pavel Felgenhauer, "War Criminals Bury Grudge," Moscow News,
17 February 2000; reproduced by Post-Soviet Armies Newsletter, http://www.psan.org.
8. "Corruption Among Officials on the Rise," RFE/RLNewsline,
2 March 2000.
9. "Kontseptsiya natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii,"
Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie, 26 November3 December 1999, pp. 1,
4, and 5; at p. 4. This document was approved by the Security Council on
5 October 1999.
10. "Russian Navy to Resume Strategic Deployments," Jane's
Defense Weekly, 1 December 1999, p. 5.
11. Vitali Denisov, "Oboronnyi zakaz uvelichitsiya v poltora raza,"
Krasnaya zvezda, 28 January 2000, p. 1.
12. Olga Antonova, "Putin Boosts Defense Spending," Moscow
News, 28 February 2000, p. 2. See also Celestine Bohlen, "Some
Skeptics See Iron Hand in Putin's Glove," TheNew York Times,
2 March 2000, p. A-8.
Copyright ISCIP 2000
Unless otherwise indicated, all articles appearing in this journal have been commissioned especially
for Perspective.